Wednesday, May 27, 2009

Plastic water bottles and the environ...

Plastic water bottles and the environment

Use them like crazy and forget the environment

I am sick and tired of industry making cheap crap regardless of what is actually good for us and messing our world up and then leaving it to the consumer to clean up the mess.  Environmental impact studies are not unheard of.  The government needs to govern and if they can hold meetings prior to building a bridge or a shopping center or the like, they can do the same with all products that potentially impact the environment.

I say use those bottles until "our" government is forced to do their job.  I refuse to keep paying for industries greed.


Thursday, May 14, 2009

Chianti

Sept. 15, 2008 -- The elixir of life may be a concoction of honey, cherries and secret herbs infused in a full Chianti wine, according to a centuries-old recipe discovered in one of Italy's oldest pharmacies.

The 18th century-old recipe was discovered in an old manuscript found among the shelves of a pharmacy in Asciano near Sienna dating back to 1715.

"My ancestors left several manuscripts with formulas for digestive drinks, but this one struck me because of its ingredients. I knew it had strong scientific basis," said pharmacist Giovanni De Munari, who found the old recipe from behind a small shelf in his Tuscany pharmacy.

Upon finding the recipe, De Munari brewed the beverage, and came up with a "low-calorie, highly digestive alcoholic infusion which tasted delicious."

The main ingredient in the elixir is the Sangiovese grape, which is the soul of Chianti wine. Until the middle of the 19th century, Chianti was based uniquely on Sangiovese grapes. Around 1850, Baron Bettino Ricasoli codified the Chianti formula and called for as much as 15 percent white grapes like malvasia.

"In our recipe, we only have Sangiovese grapes. This is much more like the famous Brunello variety which grows in this area," De Munari said.

The elixir's formula echoes recent scientific studies that credit resveratrol, a compound which is found in the skins of red grapes, with helping to prevent heart disease and other age-related illnesses.

"Researchers are currently investigating whether resveratrol acts like a longevity molecule that mimics the effects of a calorie-restricted diet," De Munari said. "My ancestors may not have known the names of the chemicals, but they knew that red wine, and Chianti in particular, had therapeutic properties."

The other ingredients in the infusion are regional natural products, and all have antiseptic and antibacteric properties, according to the pharmacist.

"They combine with resveratrol to achieve such a convincing result. We are so impressed that we are now working with a distillery in northern Italy to make the elixir on a commercial scale," De Munari said.

The elixir will be presented to the scientific community at the "Wine and Health" congress in Montalcino next month.

However, not all the ingredients will be revealed.

"It's a secret formula, like Coca Cola's recipe. Indeed, pharmacists can create great drinks," De Munari said.


Courtroom Testimony

Courtroom Testimony

These are things people actually said in court, word for word, taken down and now published by court reporters who had the torment of staying calm while these exchanges were actually taking place.


ATTORNEY: Are you sexually active?
WITNESS: No, I just lie there.


ATTORNEY: What is your date of birth?
WITNESS: July 18th.
ATTORNEY: What year?
WITNESS: Every year.


ATTORNEY: What gear were you in at the moment of the impact?
WITNESS: Gucci sweats and Reeboks.


ATTORNEY: This myasthenia gravis, does it affect your memory at all?
WITNESS: Yes.
ATTORNEY: And in what ways does it affect your memory?
WITNESS: I forget.
ATTORNEY: You forget? Can you give us an example of something you forgot?


ATTORNEY: What was the first thing your husband said to you that morning?
WITNESS: He said, "Where am I, Cathy?"
ATTORNEY: And why did that upset you?
WITNESS: My name is Susan.


ATTORNEY: Now doctor, isn't it true that when a person dies in his sleep, he doesn't know about it until the next morning?
WITNESS: Did you actually pass the bar exam?


ATTORNEY: Were you present when your picture was taken?
WITNESS: Would you repeat the question?


ATTORNEY: So the date of conception (of the baby) was August 8th?
WITNESS: Yes.
ATTORNEY: And what were you doing at that time?
WITNESS: Uh...


ATTORNEY: She had three children, right?
WITNESS: Yes.
ATTORNEY: How many were boys?
WITNESS: None.
ATTORNEY: Were there any girls?


ATTORNEY: How was your first marriage terminated?
WITNESS: By death.
ATTORNEY: And by whose death was it terminated?


ATTORNEY: Is your appearance here this morning pursuant to a deposition notice which I sent to your attorney?
WITNESS: No, this is how I dress when I go to work.


ATTORNEY: Doctor, how many of your autopsies have you performed on dead people?
WITNESS: All my autopsies are performed on dead people.


ATTORNEY: ALL your responses MUST be oral, OK? What school did you go to?
WITNESS: Oral.


ATTORNEY: Do you recall the time that you examined the body?
WITNESS: The autopsy started around 8:30 p.m.
ATTORNEY: And Mr. Denton was dead at the time?
WITNESS: No, he was sitting on the table wondering why I was doing an autopsy on him!


ATTORNEY: Are you qualified to give a urine sample?
WITNESS: Huh?


ATTORNEY: Doctor, before you performed the autopsy, did you check for a pulse?
WITNESS: No.
ATTORNEY: Did you check for blood pressure?
WITNESS: No.
ATTORNEY Did you check for breathing?
WITNESS: No.
ATTORNEY: So, then it is possible that the patient was alive when you began the autopsy?
WITNESS: No.
ATTORNEY: How can you be so sure, Doctor?
WITNESS: Because his brain was sitting on my desk in a jar.
ATTORNEY: But could the patient have still been alive, nevertheless?
WITNESS: Yes, it is possible that he could have been alive and practicing law.


12 Life Strategy Tips From Mike Caro

12 Life Strategy Tips From Mike Caro That Really Work

This is the original manuscript for a two-part series that was featured in Casino Player magazine about 1994. I spend a lot of time teaching life strategy, and there are many similarities between using correct tactics everyday and making winning decisions gambling.

But, remember, in gambling you can't beat many games, because the odds are fixed against you. So, you need to stick to the ones for which your skill is sufficient to win - such as poker, private wagers, gin rummy, and sometimes blackjack. Avoid roulette and craps.

These are games with odds that are permanently on the casino's side.  There is no way you can overcome this disadvantage, so you shouldn't play. 

But life's different. You're in that game, even if you sometimes wish you weren't - and your decisions always matter.

The original two-part series has been merged below and appears a single article. - Mike Caro

Caro's Most Powerful Gambling Advice Tackles Real-Life:

"America's Mad Genius" Mike Caro

Suddenly you're awake. But where are you? Everywhere you look there's white. White walls hug and confine you, stretching deeper and deeper, marking the boundaries of a straight, narrow, featureless hallway. You're bewildered, but who wouldn't be? Finally you stand and look behind you. All white, everything, going back to where it all vanishes.

You push against the hard white floor, swaying and almost losing your balance because you've been asleep so long. Looking ahead, you realize the hallway is not exactly like it was behind you. Almost the same, but not quite. Way, way in the distance you can see some specks. And, reasoning that specks are better than nothing, you begin walking toward them.

It takes a long time, but then the specks grow and define themselves. They have become signs, gold in color and arrow-shaped.

They hang at the end of the hallway, and you can see lettering on them. Closer and closer you walk, until you can see that there's a second hallway perpendicular to the this one. One arrow points left and reads: "Casino." The other points right and reads: "Life."

It's decisions like this that make you cry out for your mommy. Let me help. Turn right toward the real world, and I'll give you some advice as you're walking. In the future I'll provide plenty of strategy for winning at formal gambling, including some tips that will help you fare better inside the casino.

But there's something you have to understand today. Gambling games are merely formalized, simplified ways of experiencing exactly the same risks we experience in everyday life. If you're alive--as most of my readers are--you gamble. Formally or informally, you gamble.

Not surprisingly, many of the same strategies I've lectured about and analyzed with computers apply just as powerfully to everyday life as they do to formalized gambling. Somewhere down the list of my next 20 books, which I've announced but failed to deliver so far, is one called Poker Without Cards.

By the way, I absolutely never use any manipulative tactics that I teach against people I respect. Why? Because, having heard me lecture about these strategies, people would feel uncomfortable dealing with me. So, I deal with all friendly associates in a completely straightforward manner. I have to. You don't. Now here are some useful examples of gambling tips and philosophies I hope you'll successfully be able to adapt to the world around you.

1. The cards probably won't break even--not in gin rummy, not in poker, and not in real life. 

There's a common misconception that if you play poker long enough the cards will break even. Fat chance! Maybe, if you could play forever, never stopping, never sleeping, eventually you'd break even on luck. But not in just one lifetime! Early on you'd probably break even on, say, the number of full houses you were dealt, but it would take much longer to break even on circumstances surrounding those full houses. 

You might lose more hands than you should lose on average. On the other hand, sometimes opponents might have nothing to oppose you with, and you'll win nothing. You might get many full houses when you're sitting in big-limit games, or you may receive most in smaller games. You might be against weak opponents, you might not. On and on.

And the more factors you consider, the broader the range of luck, and the longer it will take for you to break even.

Does this mean some people are luckier than others for their lifetimes? You bet! But there's good news. You can still win, year after year, in gambling games requiring skill, even if you're not lucky. How? Simply by making the best decisions again and again without fail. Then, instead of being a break-even big-money player who may win $100,000 one year and lose $100,000 the next, you might win $250,000 in a lucky year and win $50,000 in an unlucky year. In this over-simplified example, the $200,000 swing from lucky year to unlucky year isn't enough to cause you to lose. At seminars, I teach that you should go to the poker table day after day on a simple mission. That mission is to make the best decisions always, and never worry about whether you're lucky or unlucky. You can't control your luck, but you can control your decisions.

Same in life. Some people spend half their lives in hospitals.  Others are healthy. All your belongings might be swept up in a tornado. You might discover a million dollar painting in you attic.

Stop expecting life to be equal for everyone. It won't be. Your mission is simply to make the best decisions with the "hands" you're dealt.

2. If you're a winner--in formal gambling or in life--you should never try to get even "for the night." 

By doing this, you're perverting your practice of making meaningful decisions while pursuing a meaningless goal. The mistake is in looking at each gambling session, or each financial venture, as a game to be won or lost. Don't! In poker, it's better to win $10,000, lose $2000, and lose $500 than to win $4,000, win $998 and win $2. In the first case, you won $7,500, but you only had one win and two losses. In the second case, you won only $5,000, but you won all three times. Oddly, most gamblers and most people in real life unconsciously feel better about the second scenario than the first.  Such feelings are natural, but they're also dangerous.

If you agree with me that $7,500 is better than $5,000, then you should clearly see that it doesn't matter where the profits come from. The next two points are closely related, and they demonstrate how most people diminish their overall success.

3. Never make anything worse.

Sure, it sounds obvious? But guess what? I've never met anyone who didn't make things worse sometimes, including myself. People get angry, and they make things worse. They lose at business or at romance, and they make things worse. It's because they're feeling so miserable that those extra losses don't seem to register. In gambling, I call this dangerous practice crossing the threshold of misery. Here's how it works.

A player sits down at blackjack thinking that the worst that can happen is he'll lose $500. Everything goes wrong and suddenly he's losing $1,000. He has now crossed the threshold of misery and maximized his ability to register pain. Losing $1,114 doesn't feel any worse than losing $1,000. That extra $114 doesn't matter, and so he concentrates less and plays worse. It happens all the time in life. Romance does this to you. Unexpected misfortune does this to you. Decisions that would normally matter (like that extra $114 in blackjack) don't seem to matter by comparison. But these decisions all add up. In life people who are heartbroken sometimes make the worst business decisions imaginable. Those decisions don't seem to matter much compared to the heartbreak. And those decisions all add up, and eventually they will matter.

In poker, many lifelong losing players would actually be lifelong winners if they simply never made things worse. Worse out of anger, worse out of exasperation, worse out of apathy, worse out of self-pity, worse out of temper. If it doesn't matter now, it will matter tomorrow. So from now on, promise yourself you will never make things worse. You will never make things worse.

4. What you've already invested doesn't matter.

Too many poker players damage their bankrolls by calculating how much they personally "invested" in the pot before making their decision about whether to bet or fold. Don't do that. The pot, all that money you're competing for, is simply there. It doesn't matter where it came from or how much of it you invested. It wouldn't matter whether it had originally been all yours or whether the players just happened to find it forgotten on the table. The pot belongs to no one
right now.

Same in life. It doesn't matter how much money, how much time, how much effort you have invested in a project. Say you purchased land for $50,000. One morning you wake up and it's only worth $25,000.

That same day, someone offers you $40,000. You should accept this offer, because you're not losing $10,000, you're gaining $15,000.  That's because what the land used to be worth doesn't matter, and what you've invested doesn't matter. You don't need to win on this investment. The trick is to make winning decisions again and again and let lifelong success take care of itself. Ignoring taxes, write-offs or anything else that will complicate this example, the land is worth $25,000 now. You can get $40,000 by selling. Selling is the right decision, and it has value--in this case, $15,000.

5. Never seek sympathy.

I teach gamblers never to complain about bad luck. First of all, nobody really cares. Their own exaggerated memories of personal bad luck dwarf whatever you're complaining about. And if you complain to opponents--such as in a poker game--they're inspired because you're unlucky. They'll think you're not a force to be reckoned with, they'll play better, and they'll cost you money.

It's the same in life. There's absolutely no reason to tell tales of misfortune. You'll inspire life's opponents, and you'll lose esteem among life's allies. So, if your luck is bad, keep it to yourself.

6. Keep your hand secret.

If you habitually exposed your poker hand before the showdown, opponents would know what you had, and they'd know for certain whether to play against you, whether to raise you, whether to pass. It would be stupid to play poker that way, but people do that everyday in real life. How?

They don't keep secrets. Listen: Never volunteer personal information to anyone who isn't a friend, unless you know specifically that you have something to gain by volunteering the information. Sound heartless? Well, OK, it's all right to volunteer useful information if it can't harm you. It's also all right to give information sometimes if you're getting information in return.

But think back. I'll bet for every time you regretted keeping secrets, there are many more times you regretted telling secrets.  

People simply give away too much information, and it eventually haunts them. Secrets can seem insignificant at the time they're shared, but later the sharing turns out to be an important mistake.

Like it or not, successful people keep secrets much better than unsuccessful people, just as successful poker players conceal their hands better than unsuccessful players. Repeating: It's a fact that people who succeed keep secrets. Never reveal important information about yourself unless you have a specific reason for doing so.

Starting now, practice telling yourself mentally why you're giving information before you give information.

People talk about their lives and their opinions, giving information that may later be damaging. They do this because they want to seem friendly. But, there's a special way you can be just as friendly and, instead of putting yourself in jeopardy, gain an advantage. How? Instead of giving information about yourself, use the same time to ask other people about themselves. If you're talking to a potential competitor, don't volunteer information; ask for opinions. I do this at the poker table. After a hand, I ask an opponent how he would have played. Usually, the player is flattered and offers a sincere answer, such as he would have bluffed. I remember that answer, and weeks later--long after the opponent has forgotten our conversation--I call and win the pot. It's the same in real life. You remember the information, and you use it later.

By the way, when I consult with businesses, there seems to be one recurring problem that comes up again and again. How can supervisors best smooth up relationships between themselves and employees who don't like them. The answer is simple. Ask the employees for their opinions. In life, you can patch up most relationships simply by softly asking a person: "What do you think?", "What would you do in this situation?", "How would you handle this?" People are universally flattered when you ask for opinions. It works with enemies, it works with employees, it works with children. Trust me, and try it. And it's consistent with the powerful poker technique of concealing your own hand while learning as much as you can about your opponents.

One of life's most important goals is to gain as much useful information from others as possible, while guarding your own secrets wisely.

7. Don't humiliate your opponents.

Always allow opponents to save face, no matter how tempting it is to gloat. When you make it painful for opponents to lose, they play better, but you want opponents to play worse . Additionally, life is complicated enough without motivating people to get even with you. So, always give those you conquer a chance to save face--unless you'll never have to confront them again.

In poker, it's the same--unless your opponent is permanently broke after losing this pot, don't humiliate him. Angry players often return to harm you. Don't gloat; win graciously.

8. Don't even the score.

This one's hard on your ego, but listen anyway. In life you don't need to get even with the person who did you wrong. Similarly, you don't need to get even with the person who bluffed you in poker. You shouldn't care where your next opportunity to gain comes from. You don't have to get even or break even with anyone. Play the opportunities as they arise. Success stacks up the same, no matter where it comes from. Some people are so busy getting even, they never have time to get ahead.

In gambling and in life, a few people are going to get the better of you. So what? If you won a bet on a basketball game, would you be upset that the other team's center scored more points than your team's center? Of course not! You won the bet, so what do you care? 

Same in life. If you win overall, don't fret over a few lost skirmishes, and never waste energy trying to get even with those who beat you.

9. Act last.
Almost no one realizes the importance of acting last. At my poker seminars, I teach how important it is to understand your position at the table. Players must act in turn, and those who act after you have an advantage because they get to see what you do before they make their decisions.

So, I teach that you should use psychology and make friends with players who act after you. They'll then be less motivated to exploit their advantages. This works in life, too. Befriend those who have an advantage, so they will be less motivated to make it difficult on you. That's important, and I'll repeat it: In life, make friends with those who could do you the most damage.

And there's more. You should usually strive to gain advantage by acting last. If you're sure that everyone will have an equal chance to act, it's better--with few exceptions--to wait to see what your opponents do, then adapt your strategy accordingly. In poker, we call it a positional advantage. Let's call it the same thing in real life.

10. Save your fancy moves for when you're running good.

In skillful gambling, when your luck is running bad, opponents often become inspired and play better. You're no longer a force to be reckoned with in their minds. Most of your fancy plays won't work because you've lost the intimidation factor, which is fundamental to many aggressive strategies. At these times, you should become a more timid player. In life, do the same thing. Sometimes in conversations or in business, things aren't really clicking and you're losing ground. You can feel it happening. Play defensively. Your image is wrong for asserting yourself, so--if possible--just lurk and don't take a stand yet. Many people desperately try to prove themselves
when they are at a disadvantage, but they ought to just sit silently. As a bonus, this silence often seems like strength to others. Repeating: When you're at a disadvantage, or you're just not in sync, don't try to prove yourself immediately. Wait it out. Sooner or later an opportunity will come, and then you can be profound or assertive.

11. Cheer for your friends.

I want to warn you about envy. Many people don't want their friends to succeed. In gambling, I never feel envious of friends who are winning more than I am. I want my friends to succeed so they can share their secrets, so they can tip me off to better games in the future, so they introduce me to rich novices looking for a game--all sorts of benefits. If your enemies win, you don't get any of these advantages. It's the same in life. You should want your friends to succeed always. The more friends you have succeeding, the more opportunities you'll have. It's just plain crazy, but common, to be jealous of your friends' successes.

12. Don't fret over each injustice.

In gambling and in life, there's always injustice. Bet on it! Poker's worst starting hands often win. And bad players sometimes get lucky. In life, the same. In fact, there's so much injustice that we couldn't possibly devote ourselves to setting things right.

Next year there will probably be 246 unbelievably unjust things that will happen to you personally. Cashiers will hand you too little change. People will spread falsehoods about you. Someone will misunderstand what you say. Crooks will scam you. On and on. And we're guessing that this will happen 246 times next year. If it only happens 230 times, you're having a good year! So, you can either just going on to the next thing, or you can damage you chances of success by dwelling on each injustice, talking about it, fuming over it. All that fusing, all that fuming, all that waste of mental energy really doesn't make sense. Why should you get aggravated, especially if you're having a good year? So, simply, learn to overlook injustices unless you're prepared to act on them. Yes, It's noble to act against injustice, but it's wasteful to dwell on personal injustices you're not willing to act on.

I'd be honored if you tried out some of the strategies we've talked about. Let me know if they work for you.


John Brown and the American Civil war

John Brown (May 9, 1800December 2, 1859)
was a white American abolitionist who advocated and practiced armed insurrection as a means to abolish all slavery.  He led the Pottawatomie Massacre in 1856 in Bleeding Kansas and the unsuccessful raid at Harpers Ferry in 1859.

President Abraham

Lincoln said he was a "misguided fanatic" and Brown has been called "the most controversial of all 19th-century Americans."[1]  His attempt in 1859 to start a liberation movement among enslaved African Americans in Harpers Ferry, Virginia, electrified the nation. He was tried for treason against the state of Virginia and was hanged, but his behavior at the trial seemed heroic to millions of Americans. Southerners alleged that his rebellion was the tip of the abolitionist iceberg and represented the wishes of the Republican Party, but those charges were vehemently denied by the Republicans.  

Historians agree that the Harpers Ferry raid in 1859 escalated tensions that a year later led to secession and the American Civil War.  

Causes of the war:

The coexistence of a slave-owning South with an increasingly anti-slavery North made conflict inevitable. Lincoln did not propose federal laws against slavery where it already existed, but he had, in his 1858 House Divided Speech, expressed a desire to "arrest the further spread of it, and place it where the public mind shall rest in the belief that it is in the course of ultimate extinction".[3]

Much of the political battle in the 1850s focused on the expansion of slavery into the newly created territories.[4][5][6]  All of the organized territories were likely to become free-soil
states, which increased the Southern movement toward secession. Both North and South assumed that if slavery could not expand it would wither and die.[7][8][9] 

Southern fears of losing control of the federal government to antislavery forces, and Northern fears that the slave power already controlled the government, brought the crisis to a head in the late 1850s. Sectional disagreements over the morality of slavery, the scope of democracy and the economic merits of free labor vs. slave plantations caused the Whig and "Know-Nothing" parties to collapse, and new ones to arise (the Free Soil Party in 1848, the Republicans in 1854, the Constitutional Union in 1860). In 1860, the last remaining national political party, the Democratic Party, split along sectional lines.

Both North and South were influenced by the ideas of Thomas Jefferson. Southerners emphasized, in connection with slavery, the states' rights[10][11][12] ideas mentioned in Jefferson's Kentucky Resolutions. Northerners ranging from the abolitionist William 
Lloyd Garrison
to the moderate Republican leader Abraham Lincoln[13] emphasized Jefferson's declaration that all men are created equal. Lincoln mentioned this proposition in his Gettysburg
Address
.

Confederate Vice President Alexander Stephens said that slavery was "the cornerstone of the Confederacy" after Southern states seceded. After Southern defeat, Stephens said that the war was not about slavery but states' rights, and became one of the most ardent defenders of the Lost Cause.[14]

All but one inter-regional crisis involved slavery, starting with debates on the three-fifths clause and a twenty year extension of the African Slave Trade in the Constitutional Convention of 1787. There was controversy over adding the slave state of Missouri to the Union that led to the Missouri Compromise of 1820, the Nullification Crisis over the Tariff of 1828 (although the tariff was low after 1846[15]), the Gag rule that prevented discussion in Congress of petitions for ending slavery from 1835–1844, the acquisition of Texas as a slave state in 1845 and Manifest Destiny as an argument for gaining new territories where slavery would become an issue after the Mexican-American War (1846–1848), which resulted in the Compromise of 1850.[16]

The Wilmot Proviso was an attempt by Northern politicians to exclude slavery from the territories conquered from Mexico.  The extremely popular antislavery novel Uncle Tom’s Cabin (1852) by Harriet Beecher Stowe greatly increased Northern opposition to the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850.[17][18]

The 1854 Ostend Manifesto was a Southern attempt to take over Cuba as a slave state. Even rival plans for Northern vs. Southern routes for a transcontinental railroad became entangled in the Bleeding Kansas controversy over slavery. The Second Party System broke down after passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act in 1854, which replaced the Missouri Compromise ban on slavery with popular sovereignty. In 1856 Congressional arguments over slavery became violent when Representative Preston Brooks of South Carolina attacked Radical Republican Senator Charles Sumner with a cane after Sumner's "Crime against Kansas" speech.[19]

The Dred Scott Decision and Lecompton Constitution of 1857 were Southern attempts to admit Kansas to the Union as a slave state. The Lincoln-Douglas debates of 1858, John Brown's raid in 1859 and the split in the Democratic Party in 1860 polarized the nation between North and South. The election of Lincoln in 1860 was the final trigger for secession. 

During the secession crisis, many sought compromise. Two of these attempts were the "Corwin Amendment" and the "Crittenden Compromise." All attempts at compromise failed.

Other factors include sectionalism (caused by the growth of slavery in the deep South while slavery was gradually phased out in Northern states) and economic differences between North and South, although most modern historians disagree with the extreme economic determinism of historian Charles Beard.[20]

There was the polarizing effect of slavery that split the largest religious denominations (the ethodistBaptist and Presbyterian churches)[21] and controversy caused by the worst cruelties of slavery (whippings, mutilations and families split apart). The fact that seven immigrants out of eight settled in the North, plus the fact that twice as many whites left the South for the North as vice versa, contributed to the South's defensive-aggressive political behavior.[22]

Southern secession was triggered by the election of Republican Abraham Lincoln[23] because regional leaders feared that he would stop the expansion of slavery and put it on a course toward extinction. 

Many Southerners thought either Lincoln or another Northerner would abolish slavery, and that it was time to secede. The slave states, which had already become a minority in the House of Representatives, were now facing a future as a perpetual minority in the Senate and Electoral College against an increasingly powerful North.

The actual causes of the war were a complex series of events, which included slavery, that began long before the first shot was fired. Competing nationalisms, political turmoil, the definition of freedom, the fate of slavery and the structure of our society and economy could all be listed as significant contributing factors in America's bloodiest conflict.


Over Qualified

Fighting the Overqualified Label: 10 Tactics for a Successful Job-Search

by Randall S. Hansen, Ph.D.

There's a dirty little secret in job-hunting, and if you're a job-seeker with several years of experience -- or worse, in middle management -- you may have been exposed to it without even being aware. What is it? It's the label hiring managers put on mid-career job-seekers who appear to have one of three flaws: too many years of experience, too much education, too highly paid in current or previous job. Yes, it's the label many job-seekers fear: being overqualified.

Overqualified is code for "will not fit the current position" -- and be forewarned that it is a difficult label to overcome.

Frequently, you will not even be aware of being labeled as overqualified because you'll simply never hear back from the prospective employer.  And before we get too much farther along in this article, let me release some guilt and confess my sins. Yes, when I was a hiring manager, I most certainly had a pile for applicants seen as overqualified - and those applicants files were placed directly into the trash. In my mind, these job-seekers could be classifiedas one of several types:

  • The out-of work-desperate-for-any-job applicant. 

    This job-seeker failed to explain why someone who worked at this level years ago would be again applying for a position at this lower level -- and is seen as someone who leave as soon as s/he got a better offer.

  • The totally incompetent applicant.

    This job-seeker had worked at the same level for more years than anyone should without giving a reason why s/he never has sought a promotion - and is seen as a liability.

  • The too-full-of-myself applicant.

    This job-seeker, often older than the hiring manager, comes off as having way too many years of experience -- and sounding as though s/he was responsible for every major accomplishment in the field.

  • The way-too-expensive-fool applicant.

    This job-seeker was currently earning a significant amount more than the very top of our salary range and was seen as someone completely out of touch with reality.

  • The been-there, done-that applicant.

    This job-seeker passed this level years ago, and for whatever reasons wishes to return to that level - but without explanation and could be perceived as washed-up, burnt-out, and in the worst cases, too old.

What should you do if you -- on paper -- fit one of the types above? Perhaps you absolutely love what you do and refuse to get promoted out of it? Or what if you are such a revenue g enerator or cost saver that you will easily earn the higher salary? The key for any job-seeker who thinks that the "Big O" label will be applied during his or her job-search is to attack the perception head-on -- before the hiring manager even has a chance to think it herself. This advice is counter to career experts' usual advice to avoid mentioning negatives until the employer raises them, but with the overqualified label, you must be proactive if you ever want a chance to make your case in a job interview.

Develop a two-part strategy. The first part focuses on your job-search correspondence tools, where you will need to develop a short statement explaining exactly why you are seeking the position given your background. The second part focuses on your sales pitch during the job interview, where you can elaborate on why your experience, skills, accomplishments, and enthusiasm make you perfect for the job.

Tactics for overcoming the overqualified label 

As you develop your strategy, here are 10 specific tactics to consider:

  1. Let your network speak for you.

    Nothing you could say about yourself is stronger than a recommendation from someone who knows you and can recommend you. The ideal scenario is for you to use your network to find someone within the organization and let that person make the first pitch for you.

  2. Focus more on skills and accomplishments than job titles.

    Use the employer's own words -- from the job description -- to show how your skills match perfectly while at the same time downplaying skills not required for this job.

  3. Take salary off the table.

    Make it clear from the beginning that you are completely flexible about salary -- and that your previous salary is of no relevance to your current job-search.

  4. Reveal financial advantages of hiring you.

    If you suspect salary will be a concern, use specific examples from your past experiences to show how you increased revenue generation and/or cut costs/realized increased savings.

  5. Emphasize teamwork and personality.

    Demonstrate that you are a team player -- that the success of the team is more important than any of the individual team members.

  6. Showcase current or cutting-edge knowledge.

    Discuss recent training or skill-building that shows that you adaptable and up-to-date -- not stuck in the ways of old.

  7. Demonstrate loyalty.

    One method to attempt to overcome the fear that you will leave as soon as a better offers comes along is to point to your longevity with previous employers.

  8. Do what it takes to get the interview.

    Be prepared to deal with the overqualified issue when you call to follow-up your application -- and sell the hiring manager on at least giving you a “meeting” if not an interview so that you can make your case in person.

  9. Everything in moderation.

    You should illustrate how you are the perfect candidate for the position without overwhelming the hiring manager with your experience -- or your ego. Avoid intimidating a younger hiring manager.

  10. Express interest, admiration, and enthusiasm.

    Nothing wins over a hiring manager more than a positive attitude and a passion for the job -- and the employer.

Final Thoughts 

If all else fails, if you have followed the guidelines in this article and are still getting the overqualified label, the one last option you have is to ask the direct question of the hiring manager. Be as blunt and direct as possible -- and ask for the same in the answer -- by asking something along the lines of: “What can I do to convince you that I am the best candidate for the job?”

And by all means, stay as positive and upbeat as possible. If you are not having success, evaluate your performance. And if you have been fired or downsized, review your actions and attitudes to be sure you are not emitting any negative (or self-doubting) vibes. (Read my article, Getting Fired: An Opportunity for Change and Growth.

Questions about some of the terminology used in this article? Get more information (definitions and links) on key college, career, and job-search terms by going to our Job-Seeker's Glossary of Job-Hunting Terms.


Dr. Randall S. Hansen is founder of 
Quintessential Careers, one of the oldest and most comprehensive career development sites on the Web, as well CEO of EmpoweringSites.com.

He is also founder of MyCollegeSuccessStory.com and EnhanceMyVocabulary.com.

He is publisher ofQuintessential Careers Press, including the Quintessential Careers electronic newsletter,QuintZineDr. Hansen is also a published author, with several books, chapters in books, and hundreds of articles. He's often quoted in the media and conducts empowering workshops around the country. Finally, Dr. Hansen is also an educator, having taught at the college level for more than 15 years. Visit his personal Website or reach him by email atrandall(at)quintcareers.com.


Poker is Skill

Scientists Tell Courts Poker is Skill, Not Luck

* By Edward Fredericks

* Published Yesterday

* Legal Poker News

* Rating: Unrated

Scientific Studies Are Cool

Scientific Studies Are Cool The evidence has been mounting in cases around the world that poker does not fit into most definitions of illegal gambling because the game's predominant element is skill. Now, two separate, detailed analyses have confirmed this conclusion, possibly helping poker to legally distinguish itself from other forms gambling.

A study by two mathematicians at the University of Hamburg's Institute of Law and Economics took the results of millions of hands of Texas Hold 'em and found that skill begins to dominate over chance at one thousand hands. Further, while chance played a part in results, better players ended up with results several deviations better than chance would afford, while bad players finished far worse than simple randomness could explain.

A second study, by online security group Cigital, in conjunction with a computer science professor from Ohio Wesleyan University, used the results of 103 million hands played last winter at PokerStars online poker room to also discover that skill was by far the dominant factor in no limit Hold 'em.

In fact, the Cigital survey showed that only in about one hand in eight did a showdown occur with the best hand of the players at start of the hand winning. Fully half of all showdowns were won by hands that could have been defeated if all players had simply played out the hand.

If only twelve percent of hands are decided by who randomly received the best cards, the study argues, then eighty-eight percent are won by players using betting and predicting skills to determine winners.

The Poker Players Alliance has hailed the research, and expects to use the information to defend court decisions concluding poker is skill, in Colorado, Pennsylvania, and South Carolina. Lawmakers will also be hard-pressed to include poker in any future anti-gambling legislation, with such compelling evidence that poker is a different game entirely than casino gambling.


Undocumented Immigrant Quote

Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented immigrant"
Is like calling a drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist ".

Trans Fats

U.S. Food and Drug Administration

Revealing /Trans/ Fats

Scientific evidence shows that consumption of saturated fat, /trans/fat, and dietary cholesterol raises low-density lipoprotein (LDL), or "bad" cholesterol, levels, which increases the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). According to the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health, more than 12.5 million Americans have CHD, and more than 500,000 die each year. That makes CHD one of the leading causes of death in the United States.

The Food and Drug Administration has required that saturated fat and dietary cholesterol be listed on food labels since 1993. With /trans/fat added to the Nutrition Facts panel, you will know for the first time how much of all three--saturated fat, /trans/ fat, and cholesterol--are in the foods you choose. Identifying saturated fat, /trans/ fat, and cholesterol on the food label gives you information you need to make food choices that help reduce the risk of CHD. This revised label will be of particular interest to people concerned about high blood cholesterol and heart disease.

However, everyone should be aware of the risk posed by consuming too much saturated fat, /trans/ fat, and cholesterol. But what is /trans/fat, and how can you limit the amount of this fat in your diet?

What is /Trans/ Fat?

Basically, /trans/ fat is made when manufacturers add hydrogen to vegetable oil--a process called hydrogenation. Hydrogenation increases the shelf life and flavor stability of foods containing these fats.

/Trans/ fat can be found in vegetable shortenings, some margarines, crackers, cookies, snack foods, and other foods made with or fried in partially hydrogenated oils. Unlike other fats, the majority of /trans/fat is formed when food manufacturers turn liquid oils into solid fats like shortening and hard margarine. A small amount of /trans/ fat is found naturally, primarily in dairy products, some meat, and other animal-based foods.

/Trans/ fat, like saturated fat and dietary cholesterol, raises the LDL cholesterol that increases your risk for CHD. Americans consume on average 4 to 5 times as much saturated fat as /trans/ fat in their diets.

Although saturated fat is the main dietary culprit that raises LDL, /trans/ fat and dietary cholesterol also contribute significantly.

Are All Fats the Same?

Simply put: No. Fat is a major source of energy for the body and aids in the absorption of vitamins A, D, E, and K, and carotenoids. Both animal-and plant-derived food products contain fat, and when eaten in moderation, fat is important for proper growth, development, and maintenance of good health. As a food ingredient, fat provides taste, consistency, and stability and helps you feel full. In addition, parents should be aware that fats are an especially important source of calories and nutrients for infants and toddlers (up to 2 years of age), who have the highest energy needs per unit of body weight of any age group.

While unsaturated fats (monounsaturated and polyunsaturated) are beneficial when consumed in moderation, saturated and /trans/ fats are not. Saturated fat and /trans/ fat raise LDL cholesterol levels in the blood. Dietary cholesterol also raises LDL cholesterol and may contribute to heart disease even without raising LDL. Therefore, it is advisable to choose foods low in saturated fat, /trans/ fat, and cholesterol as part of a healthful diet.

What Can You Do About Saturated Fat, /Trans/ Fat, and Cholesterol?

When comparing foods, look at the Nutrition Facts panel, and choose the food with the lower amounts of saturated fat, /trans/ fat, and cholesterol. Health experts recommend that you keep your intake of saturated fat, /trans/ fat, and cholesterol as low as possible while consuming a nutritionally adequate diet. However, these experts recognize that eliminating these three components entirely from your diet is not practical because they are unavoidable in ordinary diets.

Where Can You Find /Trans/ Fat on the Food Label?

Although some food products already have /trans/ fat on the label, food manufacturers have until January 2006 to list it on all their products.

You will find /trans/ fat listed on the Nutrition Facts panel directly under the line for saturated fat.

How Do Your Choices Stack Up?

With the addition of /trans/ fat to the Nutrition Facts panel, you can review your food choices and see how they stack up. The following table illustrates total fat, saturated fat, /trans/ fat, and cholesterol content per serving for selected food products.

*Total Fat, Saturated Fat, /Trans/ Fat, and Cholesterol Content Per
Serving**

ProductCommon Serving SizeTotal Fat gSat. Fat g%DV for Sat. FatTrans Fat gCombined Sat. & /Trans/Fat gChol. mg%DV for Chol.
French Fried Potatoes?
(Fast Food)   
Medium (147 g)
2773581500
Butter**
1 tbsp11735073010
Margarine, stick?
1 tbsp112103500
Margarine, tub?
1 tbsp7150.51.500
Mayonnaise??
(Soybean Oil)
1 tbsp111.5801.552
Shortening?
1 tbsp133.51847.500
Potato Chips?
Small bag (42.5 g)112103500
Milk, whole?
1 cup74.52304.83512
Milk, skim?
1 cup0000052
Doughnut?
1184.52359.5258
Cookies?
(Cream Filled)
3 (30 g)6152300
Candy Bar?
1 (40 g)1042037<51
Cake, pound?
1 slice (80 g)
163.5184.5800

*Nutrient values rounded based on FDA's nutrition labeling regulations.
** Butter values from FDA Table of /Trans/ Values, 1/30/95.
? Values derived from 2002 USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference, Release 15.
?? Prerelease values derived from 2003 USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference, Release 16.*
? *1995 USDA Composition Data.* *

Don't assume similar products are the same. Be sure to check the Nutrition Facts panel because even similar foods can vary in calories, ingredients, nutrients, and the size and number of servings in a package.

How Can You Use the Label to Make Heart-Healthy Food Choices?

The Nutrition Facts panel can help you choose foods lower in saturated fat, /trans/ fat, and cholesterol. Compare similar foods and choose the food with the lower combined saturated and /trans/ fats and the lower amount of cholesterol.

Although the updated Nutrition Facts panel will list the amount of /trans/ fat in a product, it will not show a Percent Daily Value (%DV).  While scientific reports have confirmed the relationship between /trans/fat and an increased risk of CHD, none has provided a reference value for /trans/ fat or any other information that the FDA believes is sufficient to establish a Daily Reference Value or a %DV.

There is, however, a %DV shown for saturated fat and cholesterol. To choose foods low in saturated fat and cholesterol, use the general rule of thumb that 5 percent of the Daily Value or less is low and 20 percent or more is high.

You can also use the %DV to make dietary trade-offs with other foods throughout the day. You don't have to give up a favorite food to eat a healthy diet. When a food you like is high in saturated fat or cholesterol, balance it with foods that are low in saturated fat and cholesterol at other times of the day.

Do Dietary Supplements Contain /Trans/ Fat?

Would it surprise you to know that some dietary supplements contain /trans/ fat from partially hydrogenated vegetable oil as well as saturated fat or cholesterol? It's true. As a result of the FDA's new label requirement, if a dietary supplement contains a reportable amount of /trans/ or saturated fat, which is 0.5 gram or more, dietary supplement manufacturers must list the amounts on the Supplement Facts panel. Some dietary supplements that may contain saturated fat, /trans/fat, and cholesterol include energy and nutrition bars.

Fat Tips

Here are some practical tips you can use every day to keep your consumption of saturated fat, /trans/ fat, and cholesterol low while consuming a nutritionally adequate diet.

  • Check the Nutrition Facts panel to compare foods because the serving sizes are generally consistent in similar types of foods.  Choose foods lower in saturated fat, /trans/ fat, and cholesterol.  For saturated fat and cholesterol, keep in mind that 5 percent of the daily value (%DV) or less is low and 20 percent or more is high. (There is no %DV for /trans/ fat.)
  • Choose alternative fats. Replace saturated and /trans/ fats in your diet with monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fats. These fats do not raise LDL cholesterol levels and have health benefits when eaten in moderation. Sources of monounsaturated fats include olive and canola oils.
  • Sources of polyunsaturated fats include soybean oil, corn oil, sunflower oil and foods like nuts and fish.
  • Choose vegetable oils (except coconut and palm kernel oils) and soft margarines (liquid, tub, or spray) more often because the amounts of saturated fat, /trans/ fat, and cholesterol are lower than the amounts in solid shortenings, hard margarines, and animal fats, including butter.
  • Consider fish. Most fish are lower in saturated fat than meat.  Some fish, such as mackerel, sardines, and salmon, contain omega-3 fatty acids that are being studied to determine if they offer protection against heart disease.
  • Ask before you order when eating out. A good tip to remember is to ask which fats are being used in the preparation of your food when eating or ordering out.
  • Watch calories. Don't be fooled! Fats are high in calories. All sources of fat contain 9 calories per gram, making fat the most concentrated source of calories. By comparison, carbohydrates and protein have only 4 calories per gram.

To keep your intake of saturated fat, /trans/ fat, and cholesterol low:

  • Look at the Nutrition Facts panel when comparing products. Choose foods low in the combined amount of saturated fat and /trans/ fat and low in cholesterol as part of a nutritionally adequate diet.
  • Substitute alternative fats that are higher in mono- and polyunsaturated fats like olive oil, canola oil, soybean oil, corn oil, and sunflower oil.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Highlights of the Final Rule on /Trans/ Fat

  • Manufacturers of conventional foods and some dietary supplements will be required to list /trans/ fat on a separate line, immediately under saturated fat on the nutrition label.
  • Food manufacturers have until Jan. 1, 2006, to list /trans/ fat on the nutrition label. The phase-in period minimizes the need for multiple labeling changes, allows small businesses to use current label inventories, and provides economic savings.
  • FDA's regulatory chemical definition for /trans/ fatty acids is all unsaturated fatty acids that contain one or more isolated (i.e., nonconjugated) double bonds in a /trans/ configuration.  Under the agency's definition, conjugated linoleic acid would be excluded from the definition of /trans/ fat.
  • Dietary supplement manufacturers must also list /trans/ fat on the Supplement Facts panel when their products contain reportable amounts (0.5 gram or more) of /trans/ fat. Examples of dietary supplements with /trans/ fat are energy and nutrition bars.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

For More Information

Questions and Answers on the /Trans/ Fat Final Rule
www.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/qatrans2.html
<http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/qatrans2.html>

Backgrounder
www.fda.gov/oc/initiatives/transfat/backgrounder.html
<http://www.fda.gov/oc/initiatives/transfat/backgrounder.html>

Guidance on How to Understand and Use the Nutrition Facts Panel on Food Labels
www.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/foodlab.html
<http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/foodlab.html>

Federal Register Final Rule: /Trans/ Fatty Acids in Nutrition Labeling, Nutrient Content Claims, and Health Claims
www.cfsan.fda.gov/~lrd/fr03711a.html
<http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~lrd/fr03711a.html>

Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to solicit information on /trans/fat nutrient and health claims
www.cfsan.fda.gov/~lrd/fr03711b.html
<http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~lrd/fr03711b.html>

"What's New on the Nutrition Facts Label? /Trans/ Fat Now Listed with Saturated Fat and Cholesterol."
www.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/lab-cat.html#transfat
<http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/lab-cat.html#transfat>

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Major Food Sources of /Trans/ Fat for American Adults
(Average Daily Trans Fat Intake is 5.8 Grams or 2.6 Percent of Calories)

Chart showing major food sources of trans fat for American adults.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tobacco tax increase comments

OK.  I know I'm not going to get honesty here, (if I get anything at all, other than an investigation) but I'll ask the question anyway:

What's the real reason for this increase?

According to your "Industry Circular" (http://www.ttb.gov/industry_circulars/archives/2009/ic2009_01.html) for "Roll-Your-Own Tobacco2" (which is what I smoke) the tax has gone from $1.0969 per pound to $24.78 per pound.  As you state that is a $23.6831 per pound increase. 
I ask again: What is the real reason for a 2,259.09 percent increase in these taxes?

I see that the increase for pipe tobacco went from the same $1.0969 per pound as my Roll-Your-Own, to $2.8311 per pound, a mere 258.1 percent increase.  I guess you consider pipe smokers to be of a higher class than us Roll-Your-Own smokers.  Something is not right in what's going on here.

I do not believe this has anything to do with the Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009 (the "Act," Pub. L. 111-3).  That is merely the vehicle you decided to use for your other actual reasons.  I do not believe this has anything to do with children's health.  I believe something else is going on and I am sure it has much more to do with you stealing my money.  It is plain and simple theft.

This is just another large pile of manure I am seeing more and more from "my" government.  However, in this particular case, it is a 2,259.09 percent increase in the amount of manure I am use to and thus is the reason for this "comment" on this latest attack on the ever more tax paying citizens of this country.

Written by me:
Kevin Reynolds
Hayward, CA
April 14, 2009


Suzanna Gratia Hupp Quote

"How a politician stands on the Second Amendment tells you how he or she views you as an individual... as a trustworthy and productive citizen, or as part of an unruly crowd that needs to be lorded over, controlled, supervised, and taken care of."
Dr. Suzanna Gratia Hupp

The Stock market - how it works

Once upon a time in a village, a man appeared and announced to the villagers that he would buy monkeys for $10 each.

The villagers seeing that there were many monkeys around, went out to the forest, and started catching them.

The man bought thousands at $10 and as supply started to diminish, the villagers stopped their effort. He further announced that he would now buy at $20.

This renewed the efforts of the villagers and they started catching monkeys again.

Soon the supply diminished even further and people started going back to their farms.

The offer increased to $25 each and the supply of monkeys became so little that it was an effort to even see a monkey, let alone catch it!

The man now announced that he would buy monkeys at $50!

However, since he had to go to the city on some business, his assistant would now buy on his behalf.

In the absence of the man, the assistant told the villagers. "Look at all these monkeys in the big cage that the man has collected. I will sell them to you at $35 and when the man returns from the city, you can sell them to him for $50 each."

The villagers rounded up with all their savings and bought all the monkeys.

Then they never saw the man nor his assistant ever again, only monkeys everywhere!

Now you have a better understanding of how the stock market works.

Reading Between The Lines

READING BETWEEN THE LINES
                   - Submitted by  PaulDmt
           ------------------------------------
John Jones, the head of the company asked his manager to write
a detailed employment review describing Bob Smith, one of his
programmers.

1.  Bob Smith, my assistant programmer, can always be found
2.  hard at work in his cubicle. Bob works independently, without
3.  wasting company time talking to colleagues. Bob never
4.  thinks twice about assisting fellow employees, and he always
5.  finishes given assignments on time. Often Bob takes extended
6.  measures to complete his work, sometimes skipping coffee
7.  breaks. Bob is a dedicated individual who has absolutely no
8.  vanity in spite of his high accomplishments and profound
9.  knowledge in his field. I firmly believe that Bob can be
10. classed as a high-caliber employee, the type which cannot be
11. dispensed with. Consequently, I duly recommend that Bob be
12. promoted to executive management, and a proposal will be
13. executed as soon as possible.

Signed ...
Jim

-----
A MEMO WAS SOON SENT FOLLOWING THE LETTER:

John, That idiot was reading over my shoulder while I wrote the report sent to you earlier today.

Kindly read only the odd numbered lines above (1, 3, 5, etc...) for my true assessment of him.

Regards ...
Jim

PETA Kills Pets

PETA Killed 95 Percent of Adoptable Pets in its Care During 2008

Hypocritical Animal Rights Group?s 2008 Disclosures Bring Pet Death Toll To 21,339

WASHINGTON DC ? Today the nonprofit Center for Consumer Freedom (CCF) published documents online showing that People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) killed 95 percent of the adoptable pets in its care during 2008. Despite years of public outrage over its euthanasia program, the animal rights group kills an average of 5.8 pets every day at its Norfolk, VA headquarters.

According to public records from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, PETA killed 2,124 pets last year and placed only seven in adoptive homes. Since 1998, a total of 21,339 dogs and cats have died at the hands of PETA workers.

Despite having a $32 million budget, PETA does not operate an adoption shelter. PETA employees make no discernible effort to find homes for the thousands of pets they kill every year. Last year, the Center for Consumer Freedom petitioned Virginia?s State Veterinarian to reclassify PETA as a slaughterhouse.

CCF Research Director David Martosko said: ?PETA hasn?t slowed down its hypocritical killing machine one bit, but it keeps browbeating the rest of society with a phony ?animal rights? message. What about the rights of the thousands of dogs, cats, puppies, and kittens that die in PETA?s headquarters building??

Martosko added: ?Since killing pets is A-OK with PETA, why should anyone listen to their demands about eating meat, using lab rats for medical research, or taking children to the circus??

CCF obtained PETA?s ?Animal Record? filings since 1998 from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services. Members of the public can see these documents at PetaKillsAnimals.com.

In addition to exposing PETA?s hypocritical record of killing defenseless animals, the Center for Consumer Freedom has publicized the animal rights group?s ties to violent activists, and shed light on its aggressive message-marketing to children.

The Center for Consumer Freedom is a nonprofit coalition supported by restaurants, food companies, and consumers, working together to promote personal responsibility and protect consumer choices.

For media comment, contact our media department at 202-463-7112 ext. 115

Milk is poison

White Poison: The Horrors of Milk

By Shanti Rangwani, ColorLines. Posted December 3, 2001.

The pus, blood, antibiotics, and carcinogens in milk -- and the chronic fatigue, anemia, asthma and autoimmune disorders caused by milk consumption -- do no body good.

Got milk? If not, then thank your lucky stars. Because if you do, medical research shows that you are likely to be plagued by anemia, migraine, bloating, gas, indigestion, asthma, prostate cancer, and a host of potentially fatal allergies -- especially if you are a person of color.

Ignoring this, the government declares that milk is essential to good health, subsidizes the milk industry to the tune of billions of dollars, and requires milk in its public school lunch programs. And celebrity shills sporting milk mustaches tell us that milk is rich in proteins, calcium, and vitamins -- and very cool to boot.

They forget to tell you about the dangers lurking in that innocuous-looking glass of white. Once criticized only by naturopaths and vegans, now the health effects of milk are being decried by many mainstream doctors. The supposedly hip milk mustache is actually a creamy layer of mucus, live bacteria, and pus.

Former Chairman of Pediatrics at Johns Hopkins University, Frank Oski, M.D. even has a book called Don't Drink Your Milk which blames every second health problem kids suffer on hormone-ridden commercial milk. Sixty percent of ear infections in kids under six years of age are milk-induced, and milk consumption is the number one cause of iron-deficiency anemia in infants today according to the American Association of Pediatrics.

But milk is also a racial issue. Almost 90 percent of African Americans and most Latinos, Asians, and Southern Europeans lack the genes necessary to digest lactose, the primary sugar in milk. The milk industry's response is classic: they have launched new campaigns arguing that non-whites can digest milk if they take in small sips during the day. There is a burgeoning industry worth $450 million a year churning out products designed to minimize lactose intolerance.

Lactose intolerance is the most common "food allergy," but to call it an allergy is to take a white-centric view that trivializes the fact that most of the world's people are not biologically designed to digest milk.

Milk does no body good, but for the vast majority of the world's people -- people of color -- it is a public health disaster.

No other animal drinks cow's milk, not even calves once they are weaned. The late Dr. Benjamin Spock, the U.S.'s leading authority on child care, spoke out against feeding "cow's glue" to children, saying it can cause anemia, allergies, and diabetes and in the long term, will set kids up for obesity and heart disease, the number one cause of death in this country.

Most of milk's much-vaunted protein is contained in casein -- which is also a raw material for commercial glue. Undigested, it simply sticks to the intestinal walls and blocks nutrient absorption.

The mainstream media and the government ignore the medical studies showing that milk is a serious health threat, in part because people of color are the main victims. The institutionalization of racism is highlighted by U.S. Department of Agriculture spokesperson Eilene Kennedy's statement on milk, that the government's recommended food pyramid is intended for "the majority of Americans. It doesn't communicate to all Americans."

The USDA continues to require that school lunch programs include milk with every meal, and recommend that we glug milk for calcium, even though Harvard studies show an increase in osteoporosis and bone-breakage in people who consume milk. It says we should drink milk to prevent heart disease (and is echoed by Larry King) even though saturated fat constitutes 55 percent of milk solids.

The dairy lobby perpetrates lies to ensure its profits. It benefits directly from the exaggerated support prices the government shells out for this "health food." The government pays over a billion dollars a year for surplus butter. A General Accounting Office (GAO) study concluded that a reduction in the government price support system would have netted consumers savings of $10.4 billion from 1986 to 2001. And the USDA pays inflated prices to purchase dairy products for both the Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) and federal school lunch programs -- milking the taxpayers and actually getting them to pay for poisoning 26 million school kids.

The milk lobby has whipsawed its way into the highest echelons of power. Staffers under Richard Nixon were indicted for accepting $300,000 from the dairy lobby for making milk part of the school lunch program.

Dr. Robert Cohen of the Dairy Education Board, a nonprofit organization dedicated to exposing the milk lobby, contends that the dramatic 52 percent rise in asthma deaths among minority kids in New York coincided with the surplus milk, cheese, and butter pumped into them under the USDA's free school lunch and breakfast giveaway programs. The incidence of asthma deaths may be even higher since asthma is not a reportable disease, and asthma deaths are sometimes certified as cardiovascular disease.

There is also a direct link between milk consumption and prostate cancer among African Americans, who have the highest incidence of this disease in the world. A study in Cancer has shown that men who reported drinking three or more glasses of whole milk daily had a higher risk for prostate cancer than men who reported never drinking whole milk.

The controversial Bovine Growth Hormone (BGH) -- banned in most countries -- is pumped into U.S. milch cows to increase annual yield (50,000 pounds of milk per cow today compared to 2,000 pounds in 1959). Milk from cows treated with BGH is likely to contain pus from their udders since the hormone leads to mastitis, or udder infection. BGH use results in a tumor-promoting chemical (IGF-I) that has been implicated in an explosive increase of cancer of the colon, smooth muscle, and breast.

The antibiotics dairy farmers use to treat BGH-caused infections in cows appear in their milk and greatly hasten human tolerance to most antibiotics, a potentially life-threatening state of affairs. The Center for Science in the Public Interest reports that 38 percent of milk samples in 10 cities were contaminated with sulfa drugs and other antibiotics.

A fightback is beginning. Protesters picketed New York City Mayor Rudolph Giuliani's planned milk promotion campaign with a photo of the mayor wearing a milk mustache over the caption, "Got Prostate Cancer?" Giuliani (who, like his father, has prostate cancer) dropped the campaign. And doctors from the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (PCRM) persuaded Washington, D.C. Mayor Anthony Williams not to declare May 11 as "Drink Chocolate Milk Day" by presenting evidence that milk is harmful, especially to people of color.

The PCRM -- composed of some of the leading doctors in the U.S. -- has campaigned extensively in the health and consumer press and led a successful legal effort in 1999 to make dairy products optional in the federal food guidelines. The campaign was supported by a number of prominent civil rights organizations and leaders, including the Congressional Black Caucus, the NAACP, Martin Luther King, III, Jesse Jackson, Jr., the National Hispanic Medical Association, and former Surgeon General Joycelyn Elders.

The dairy lobby remains cozy with most medical practitioners to perpetrate its "drink milk" propaganda. However, not one of the 1,500 papers listed in Medicine that deal with milk points to its goodness -- only to the pus, blood, antibiotics, and carcinogens in milk, and the chronic fatigue, anemia, asthma, and autoimmune disorders milk consumption causes.

The time has come for the milk industry to face the kind of scrutiny that the tobacco companies face today. Meanwhile, discard the moo juice.

Shanti Rangwani is an allopathic doctor and a columnist for the Times of India